Keeping The Main Thing The Main Thing
Something has always not quite sat right with me about issues-driven churches. I know that statement needs a bit of an unpacking, so lemme do it with an example.
A few months back, I was talking with a friend who had recently moved, and we were talking about the new church he and his family were going to.
The thing that stuck out to me was he said (paraphrase), “They’re really into social justice and that’s something we like about them.”
Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m all for social justice. The Old Testament is full of it. It’s a dominant theme throughout the entire book of Jeremiah. And you can certainly look at how Jesus held up the marginalized members of society during his time (women, Samaritans, etc) for examples of social “justice”.
But there’s just something about when a church starts to define its character (or brand, if you will) by something other than the gospel that I start to squirm a bit. But I couldn’t quite put my finger on why I wiggled until I read a passage in C.S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters the other night.
If you’re not familiar with the book, it’s a series of letters to “Wormwood” (a young demon) from “Screwtape” (his “affectionate uncle”) on how to best go about the business of leading Wormwood’s “patient” into Hell as opposed to Heaven.
The timeframe is WWII, the patient has just become a Christian, and leading up to the relevant quote Screwtape says:
He goes on to discuss the merits of either approach, and then concludes the letter with this:
It clicked.
(And if you already knew what my issue was after reading the first sentence of this post, then you’re just a more astute person than I am. Congrats!)
The last thing Jesus told his boys to do was to make disciples of all nations and teach believers to obey everything Jesus had taught. That’s the core of the church’s purpose: preach the gospel to save people, and then teach the gospel so people can grow and live abundant lives that bring God glory.
Everything the church does—and it is called to do quite a few things—should support and sustain those two purposes. Nothing is more important than making disciples and teaching them. And no small part of the gospel is more important than the whole gospel.
In fact, you could possibly make a case that the teaching part is more central than evangelism. That evangelism will naturally flow out of preaching the word of God and from people living godly lives, but that’s another post.
There’s nothing wrong with a church being concerned about social justice or any other “godly” issue. The problem is when these issues become the driving focus, the defining characteristic. Because then it changes from being a healthy part of gospel living into a distraction from the real task at hand.
ADDENDUM: Ha! I was more prescient than I thought. Read Letter #23 the other night. This was the final paragraph. Reminder: "Enemy" = "God".
About the general connection between Christianity and politics, our position is more delicate. Certainly we do not want men to allow their Christianity to flow over into their political life, for the establishment of anything like a really just society would be a major disaster. On the other hand we do want, and want very much, to make men treat Christianity as a means; preferably, of course, as a means to their own advancement, but, failing that, as a means to anything—even to social justice. The thing to do is to get a man at first to value social justice as a thing which the Enemy demands, and then work him on to the stage at which he values Christianity because it may produce social justice. For the Enemy will not be used as a convenience. Men or nations who think they can revive the Faith in order to make a good society might just as well think they can use the stairs of Heaven as a short cut to the nearest chemist's shop. Fortunately it is quite easy to coax humans round this little corner. Only today I have found a passage in a Christian writer where he recommends his own version of Christianity on the ground that "only such a faith can outlast the death of old cultures and the birth of new civilisations". You see the little rift? "Believe this, not because it is true, but for some other reason." That's the game.
Recent Comments