The last few discussions have been good ones with the young adult group. Actually, all of them have been good, but the one from two weeks ago (off last week for a World Cup group bbq) was especially lively—talking about idolatry. What is it? Why does God tell us not to do it? How do we pervert our understanding of God when we have idols? How does idolatry pervert our relationship with God and our purpose on earth? What are modern day idols? Very spirited discussion. The week before that was gossip, also a lively talk. Lots of confessions, but lots of good thoughts about how to avoid it as well.
So I was a little hesitant when Laura suggested to make the topic for last night “doctrine”.
We’d gotten the latest issue of Connections in the mail last week and the cover article was “The D Word-Has ‘Doctrine’ Become The New Dirty Word?” Good piece about how modern culture and religious movements like the emergent church have begun to marginalize the concept of doctrine. Good article and certainly worth the read.
I wasn’t sure what kind of discussion it would be, honestly. A lot of them are church kids, so it could be totally boring with lots of “right” answers. Turns out I was wrong.
I started off by asking, “What comes to your mind when I say the word ‘doctrine’?”
The answers, by and large, boiled down to two themes:
• Doctrines are written by people smarter than me.
• Doctrines are boring and don’t matter much.
It was then that I knew I had my discussion cut out for me.
We spent the rest of the meeting talk about what doctrines are, how they differ from theology, why it is important to have biblically sound doctrines, what happens when we have bad doctrines, and then touched on a few of the biggie doctrines and their tenants that have come under fire—Trinity, Christ, Hell/Heaven, Exclusivity (and sufficiency) of Christ for salvation, omniscience of God, and some others offshoots.
As the discussion kicked in, I really wanted to help them understand that while they may dismiss the idea of studying doctrines, we all subscribe to them—whether we call them that or not. And the whole point of good doctrine is to lead us deeper into the Bible and into our knowledge of God, not to write research papers on.
I think to some extent the discussion helped open their eyes to the importance of doctrines and the role they play in our faith. And that they’re not mutually exclusive with having a “relational” faith. In fact, they’re central to having the right kind of relationships.
The more we learn about God, the more complex and mysterious we realize He is. Sort of a “How deep does the rabbit hole go?” type thing. To ignore doctrines because they’re complex or intimidating is cheapening our faith and robbing us of a deeper knowledge of a God who wants to be known.
Besides, Malcolm keeps telling me how readable Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology is, so I guess I don't have any more excuses.
Recent Comments